Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05401
Original file (BC 2012 05401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05401
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO
	

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he modified his children 
only Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage to 
spouse and children.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was never counseled nor made aware he had to update his RCSBP 
election within a year of his marriage.  He never received any 
paperwork notifying him of this requirement and he was under the 
impression his wife was added to the plan when he updated his 
marital status.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described 
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility which is included at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice.  The applicant was notified of his 
eligibility to participate in the RCSBP and made an election for 
full coverage for his spouse and children on 1 Feb 88.  He was 
divorced on 10 Feb 03 and notified ARPC of said divorce within 
one year that he wanted to change his election from Spouse and 
Children to Children Only.  The applicant subsequently re-
married but failed to request coverage for his new spouse within 
the one-year period required by Title 10, United States Code 
(U.S.C.), Section 1448(a)(5)(B).  On 24 Nov 04, the applicant 
applied for reserve retired pay, but took no action to modify 
his child only coverage to spouse and children coverage when his 
coverage converted from RCSPB to SBP when he started collecting 
retired pay.  While the applicant contends that he was not 
properly advised of the one year requirement, to add his new 
spouse to his RCSBP, he was sent a RCSBP information packet 
informing him that,  any life changing events must be reported 
within one year of the event.  It also instructed the applicant 
to contact ARPC should he have any questions or concerns.  The 
applicant remembered to comply with the requirement when he 
requested the change following his divorce back in 2003; 
however, there is no record of any attempts made to contact ARPC 
regarding his RCSBP for remarriage or retirement.  

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 Mar 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit 
D).

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05401 in Executive Session on 29 Aug 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 , Panel Chair
                 , Member
                 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Nov 12, w/atch.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 20 Mar 13, w/atchs.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Mar 13.




			
			Panel Chair




2

3






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00104

    Original file (BC 2014 00104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 3 Jan 14, the applicant signed DD Form 2656-6, Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate, establishing his children as the beneficiaries of his RCSBP. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00383

    Original file (BC 2014 00383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He elected RCSBP child coverage. The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as he was unaware he had to elect SBP spouse coverage within one year of marriage. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00793

    Original file (BC-2011-00793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Aug 1994, the decedent and the applicant divorced. If the documents were provided within the required timeframe, DPTT would have been unable to update the member's RCSBP election due to the member not electing to participate in the Plan when eligible. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of her request, the applicant provides two letters.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 00362

    Original file (BC 2012 00362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 May 93, the member completed an ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, and indicated that he had no eligible spouse or children and deferred participation. The applicant and the member were divorced on 24 Aug 93. As of this date, a response has not been received by this office (Exhibit C).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02817

    Original file (BC 2013 02817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant had one year from the date of his marriage to add his spouse to his RCSBP election. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05185

    Original file (BC 2013 05185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made his RCSBP election when he entered retired status. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00171

    Original file (BC-2011-00171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, neither the applicant nor his former spouse deemed an election for former spouse coverage under the RCSBP and the applicant's RCSBP election changed to children only. When the member filled out his application for retired pay, DD Form 2656, he made an election for former spouse. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05474

    Original file (BC 2013 05474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Mar 11, his son was born and he turned in his son’s birth certificate for update in DEERS. Since he had not been married before and was still on Active Reserves, he was told there was nothing else needed and DEERS was updated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01704

    Original file (BC-2013-01704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01704 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01718

    Original file (BC 2012 01718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states the member and/or his former spouse had one year from the date of the QDRO, dated 9 Oct 01, to make a former spouse deemed election to the Secretary concerned. He states the QDRO does not provide the required “election data” necessary to complete the SBP enrollment form. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...